🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

It comes amid broader worries about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, international health experts raised concerns that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We reside in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves growing volumes of black market activity”.

The country's office of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.